Simplify Your Laptop Search with Tested Reviews and Expert Advice
Guide

Tp-link archer mr600 vs mr400: battle for the ultimate mobile router crown

My name is Michael, and I am passionate about all things laptops. With years of experience as a technology journalist and reviewer, I have an in-depth understanding of the latest and greatest laptops on the market.

What To Know

  • The Archer MR400, on the other hand, utilizes a Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem, with maximum download speeds of 600 Mbps and upload speeds of 100 Mbps.
  • If you prefer a more portable and affordable option with decent performance, the Archer MR400 is a suitable choice.
  • Yes, these routers can be used as a primary internet connection if you have a strong and stable LTE signal in your area.

In today’s fast-paced world, reliable and speedy internet access is crucial. For those on the go, mobile broadband routers offer a convenient solution. Two popular options in the market are the TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400. This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key features, performance, and other aspects to help you make an informed decision.

Performance: Speed and Coverage

The Archer MR600 boasts a powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modem, capable of delivering theoretical download speeds of up to 1.2 Gbps and upload speeds of up to 150 Mbps. The Archer MR400, on the other hand, utilizes a Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem, with maximum download speeds of 600 Mbps and upload speeds of 100 Mbps. In real-world scenarios, the MR600 is expected to provide faster internet speeds, especially in areas with strong LTE coverage.

Both routers support 4G LTE Cat 6, ensuring wide compatibility with mobile networks. They also feature dual-band Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz), allowing for simultaneous connections to multiple devices.

Design and Features

The Archer MR600 sports a sleek and compact design with external antennas for improved signal reception. It includes a 1.4-inch LCD display that provides real-time information on network status, data usage, and more. The Archer MR400 has a more traditional design with built-in antennas, making it slightly more portable.

In terms of features, the MR600 offers a wider range of options. It supports MU-MIMO (Multi-User, Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output) technology, which allows multiple devices to connect simultaneously without experiencing significant speed drops. Additionally, it has a built-in USB port for sharing storage devices or connecting a printer.

Battery Life and Portability

The Archer MR600 has a slightly larger battery capacity (2550 mAh) compared to the Archer MR400 (2000 mAh). This translates to approximately 10 hours of continuous use for the MR600 and 7 hours for the MR400. Both routers support fast charging via USB-C.

When it comes to portability, the MR400 has a slight advantage due to its smaller size and weight. It weighs around 9.9 ounces, while the MR600 weighs slightly more at 10.9 ounces.

Security and Management

Both the Archer MR600 and MR400 offer robust security features, including WPA3 encryption and a built-in firewall. They also support TP-Link’s Tether app, which allows you to manage your router settings, monitor network usage, and perform firmware updates remotely.

Price and Availability

The TP-Link Archer MR600 is typically priced around $250-$300, while the Archer MR400 is available for around $150-$200. Both routers are widely available through online retailers and electronics stores.

Which One is Right for You?

The choice between the TP-Link Archer MR600 and MR400 depends on your specific needs and budget.

  • If you prioritize speed, range, and advanced features, the Archer MR600 is the clear choice.
  • If you prefer a more portable and affordable option with decent performance, the Archer MR400 is a suitable choice.

The Final Verdict

Both the TP-Link Archer MR600 and MR400 are excellent mobile broadband routers, offering reliable internet access on the go. The MR600 shines with its superior performance and feature set, while the MR400 impresses with its portability and value for money. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual requirements and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which router has better coverage?
A: The Archer MR600 has external antennas, which may provide slightly better coverage in certain environments.

Q: Can I use these routers as a primary internet connection at home?
A: Yes, these routers can be used as a primary internet connection if you have a strong and stable LTE signal in your area.

Q: How long does it take to charge the batteries?
A: Both routers support fast charging via USB-C, and the charging time varies depending on the charger used.

Q: Which router has a longer warranty?
A: Both the Archer MR600 and MR400 come with a 2-year limited warranty from TP-Link.

Q: Can I use these routers with my current SIM card?
A: Yes, these routers are compatible with most major cellular carriers and SIM cards.

Was this page helpful?

Michael

My name is Michael, and I am passionate about all things laptops. With years of experience as a technology journalist and reviewer, I have an in-depth understanding of the latest and greatest laptops on the market.
Back to top button